Geospatial Analysis: Tasks vs Markets

Here’s an interesting departure from our regular technical talk with thoughts on what geospatial users and markets look like.  I know we all have different perspectives on this, and this is highly subjective, but I thought it would be worth sharing mine.

Clearly we can draw some broad strokes between markets such as environmental, defense, agriculture, coastal, forestry, mining, etc. etc.  As software providers, we strive to build solutions to help solve the problems people have in their respective domains.  However, it is very clear that there are major overlaps between domains.  A person in coastal studies could clearly be interested in environmental impacts as well as hazard mitigation and resource extraction.  As a software provider, it’s a challenge to create solutions targeted to a domain because of the overlap.  So, we like to take the approach of helping people solve their tasks.

Across geospatial domains people do need to be able to monitor and quantify change – whether it be for military intelligence or for environmental diagnostics.  Similarly, people need to have robust land cover analysis for mapping and further geospatial analysis in platforms like Arc.  Image scientists would want accurate reflectance measurements for material identification, albedo measurement, and myriad other tasks.  Creating these “atomic” tools allows us to help a wide array of users across many industries to extract information from imagery to be used in the larger scope of solving their overall problems.

That being said, we love to hear from our users in how we can better help and add value to their processes, so don’t be shy.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Geospatial Data and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Geospatial Analysis: Tasks vs Markets

  1. blamannen says:

    From my perspective the best “atomic tool” would be a batch processing system that works easily (e.g.using models). A GUI model builder would be great even without a Batch capability. As ENVI is based on IDL routines it should be easy to implement shouldn’t it? And can Santa bring me an improved Band Math functionality.

  2. Pete says:

    Thanks Blamannen. We’ve experimented with GUI model builders in the past, but there wasn’t a lot of interest so we back-burnered it. I’m curious to know what you’d like improved in the Band Math – a better GUI, more flexible expressions, other?

    • blamannen says:

      Hi Pete,
      thanks for your reply to my comment. I’d like a wider range of mathematical functions, a better GUI (including the possibility to use bands from several files so I don’t need to layer stack all the time, and a much much larger field to enter expressions). Ideally I’d like to be able to enter expressions such as polynomial fits easily, correlate bands, use variables I’ve already stated etc. Much of that which can be done in IDL but without needing to learn the language.

  3. Pete says:

    thanks Blamannen. Great feedback.

  4. Pingback: Environmental Conservation and Geospatial Image Analysis | ImagerySpeaks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s